Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 13, 2024, 7:19 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
The product in question, a wedding cake, is not being sold as a commodity. It is a bespoke product. It is also a product used specifically as a symbolic expression to convey meaning. It is like the difference between a bed sheet and a flag. Burning a bed sheet is not a symbolic act; burning a flag is a symbolic act. The plaintiffs in this specific case are using state power and forcing the baker to design and craft a symbolic product. As such, it is compelled speech.

Speaking personally, as an architect, I could understand if other architects chose not to design religious buildings or abortion clinics. I don't see why a lawyer could not decline to defend oil company lobbists or graphic designers refuse to design product packaging for sex toys. As far as I'm concerned if a flag maker chose make flags and banners for any country, except Israel or South Africa, that's fine by me. For many business owners and entrepreneurs, such as myself, what we do for a living is an extension of ourselves. We choose to go into businesses so that we can decide for ourselves what is important and reflects our values. Having your own business represents personal and financial liberty. We apply our talents and resources so as not to be beholden to supervisors, bosses, or shareholders. We especially do not want to be agents of the state, having the government twist our businesses to satisfy whatever social engineering goals that the government considers desirable.
<insert profound quote here>
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker - by Neo-Scholastic - June 7, 2018 at 11:14 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  HIV drug mandate violates religious freedom, judge rules zebo-the-fat 6 1074 September 9, 2022 at 6:12 pm
Last Post: Divinity
  Leaked Supreme Court Decision signals majority set to overturn Roe v. Wade Cecelia 234 19098 June 7, 2022 at 11:58 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Colorado shooting, 5 dead. brewer 0 334 December 28, 2021 at 8:11 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Supreme Court To Take Up Right to Carry Firearm Outside Home onlinebiker 57 2689 April 29, 2021 at 8:20 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Court Ordered Quarantine brewer 2 481 October 24, 2019 at 10:15 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Supreme Court Considers Mandatory Govt Funding of Religious Education EgoDeath 8 835 September 24, 2019 at 10:37 am
Last Post: EgoDeath
  Fed Court, "hand over 8yrs of your finances" Brian37 15 1169 May 22, 2019 at 6:34 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2 Angrboda 330 18449 August 23, 2018 at 10:13 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Court of Appeals Tells Alabama Shitheads to "Fuck Off!" Minimalist 6 1198 August 23, 2018 at 2:00 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  Federal Judge rules "No fundamental right to literacy" Cecelia 69 8934 July 2, 2018 at 10:52 pm
Last Post: Fireball



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)