(December 16, 2018 at 12:53 am)Belaqua Wrote: The worst example I can think of off hand is in Dawkins' book, where he thinks he has rebutted Thomas Aquinas.
What's even more stupid? Thinking the standard debunking of Aquinas' quinque viae (which has been around so long, Aquinas was still alive when it was first formulated) doesn't debunk it.
The simple fact of the matter every single one of the five "proofs" for god depend on god not having the qualities of every single item in existence. Hence god "the necessary being" cannot exist by Aquinas' own assumptions!
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home