Angry Atheists and Anti-Theists

[Belacqua]

You took it up with me when you made three assertions. You said I was guilty of "special pleading," "unwarranted reinterpreting," and that I was making a "bogus claim." 

If you are serious about these claims, I hope you will make an argument. I don't think you can make a serious argument, because in fact all your claims are false. 

I just now looked at the Wikipedia article about Aquinas' Five Ways. What is written there is consistent with what I've read in other sources. If you can demonstrate that something in the Wikipedia article is mistaken, we can look from there. If you can't, then I think you are basing your complaint here on your own faulty interpretation. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Ways_(Aquinas)

I suggest you take your argument over to http://atheistdiscussion.org/forums/show...89&page=16 where this discussion is ongoing.

That discussion is about the Kalam argument, which is entirely different from Aquinas.