(January 4, 2019 at 3:36 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:(January 4, 2019 at 2:53 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: That's what I thought. Would have been easier to just say "no".
You seem to have this notion that I owe you something. I don't. Common sense is that if you know someone is predisposed to say "no" to anything you suggest to them, then at some point there is no reason to attempt to say to them anything that they will just default to "no" as a response to anyway.
You owe me nothing.
You memory seems to be quite deficient.
YOU objected when I said both "god" and "complexity" for the purposes HERE were undefined.
In response all we get is this LAME shit about dictionaries.
The fact is you cannot define complexity in a way that defines what IS and IS NOT complex enough, to require a designer.
You also have no coherent definition of a god, which doen not incorporate the problems you were asked to explain.
You lack of definitions means you have none, and you have failed.
Thanks for conclusively demonstrating yet again, you're all bluster and evasion, and no substance. All hat. No cattle.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist