(October 12, 2011 at 8:13 am)fr0d0 Wrote: So you quoted the right answers, but do you get the rationalisation behind them? ie: there is a point where you don't agree with those definitions and would argue your own rationalisation in favour: where is that point?
Where I disagree on Yaweh's nature is irrelevant, because the issue at hand is whether I can understand your interpretation. What does my differing opinion have to do with understanding yours?
fr0d0 Wrote:If you can quote them but they make no sense to you then that's the same as not understanding. Would you agree?
Yes, but unfortunately I don't have time to break it down. If you insist, I can do it in the ner future.
fr0d0 Wrote:Right. It makes my point too though. "It doesn't make sense therefore we refuse to consider it".
I believe it's saying it's impossible to consider it, not just that they refuse to.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell