(August 4, 2019 at 9:52 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(August 4, 2019 at 9:26 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: Christianity is more in conflict with origins than it is with whatever happens after. Evolution falls in the safe zone, which as a mechanism it doesn't say anything about origins. But to be fair, if a conflict does exist, then I'm sure most Christians would say "God did it, therefore it couldn't have evolved" not "It couldn't have evolved, therefore God did it."
I'm not sure why a new hypothesis needs to be offered in order to point out that the existing one is flawed? Can you expound on that further?
One doesn’t. But, if you, a Christian, came here to an atheist forum with the intention of pointing out a perceived flaw in evolution, then tipping your hat at us on the way out without a word about Christ, I’ll eat both my shoes. Do you think this is our first rodeo?
Don't worry, I don't think this is your first rodeo. The ecological fallacy only occurs when inference about an individual are deduced from assumptions about a group. The purpose of memory is to guide future behavior, so its understandable why you would look towards previous experiences and apply them to your interactions with me.
