Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)

[Nay_Sayer]

Christianity is more in conflict with origins than it is with whatever happens after. Evolution falls in the safe zone, which as a mechanism it doesn't say anything about origins. But to be fair, if a conflict does exist, then I'm sure most Christians would say "God did it, therefore it couldn't have evolved" not "It couldn't have evolved, therefore God did it."

I'm not sure why a new hypothesis needs to be offered in order to point out that the existing one is flawed? Can you expound on that further?

One doesn’t. But, if you, a Christian, came here to an atheist forum with the intention of pointing out a perceived flaw in evolution, then tipping your hat at us on the way out without a word about Christ, I’ll eat both my shoes. Do you think this is our first rodeo?

So this isn't our usual sock filled friend?  I assumed he was being he skipped the intro entirely and went straight into the rhetoric.