(August 6, 2019 at 4:39 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:Lie.(August 6, 2019 at 3:42 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Any connection between eyespots and motor cells is already the prototypical nervous system.
Overdeveloped, in any sense, that confers additional advantage. Shorter longer, faster slower, more or even less focused.
The criteria is open ended, in specifics. Just anything that helps them have more offspring than their peers for any reason whatsoever.
The order of evolutionary emergence isn’t set, either. Plants have eyespots, but never developed a nervous system at all.
Not that this will help, lol....but-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_...us_systems
Overdevelopment to me implies excess or redundancy, or more than what is needed. That's why I wanted clarification. Overdeveloped in reference to what?
The order of evolutionary emergence is already set for everything that has already occurred. That's why referencing plants or other species isn't useful, unless you're saying there were plant-like organisms in our evolutionary past that we can look at.
(August 6, 2019 at 4:33 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: I am not a professor, I never claimed to be one. Fuck off with the abject lies, moron.
Oops I meant to say Professor X (thus why Professor was capitalized).
(August 6, 2019 at 4:39 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: Given your telepathic mind reading capabilities: "I was pretty good at spotting the pretenders."Strawman.
I made no claim to any form of so called "telepathy". Withdraw that scurrilous claim immediately. Or just tell more lies as seems best to you.