RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
August 7, 2019 at 1:21 pm
(This post was last modified: August 7, 2019 at 1:37 pm by John 6IX Breezy.)
(August 7, 2019 at 1:16 pm)Grandizer Wrote:(August 7, 2019 at 1:09 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: Yup, I did; nothing comes up as expected. Should I try Bing or Yahoo?
If not mistaken, LFC already posted a snippet or two that answers your question.
Otherwise, Wikipedia Scientific theory and you can see the criteria there.
Here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory
I did a quick search for "established" in your Wikipedia link. Sadly, it doesn't appear to list the scientific criteria for well-established. Moreover, the page also seems to treat the term well-established as describing some, but not all theories. Which I agree with. Some theories are well established, others are not.
Surely, if well-established isn't just a subjective description of a theory (like good, bad, terrible), criteria must exist between being well-established and not. How would we ever know when something is a theory, is we have no measure of how well-established it is?
