RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
August 7, 2019 at 3:18 pm
(This post was last modified: August 7, 2019 at 3:22 pm by Succubus.)
(August 7, 2019 at 1:01 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: In what way can something be well-established, and based on solid evidence, but be wrong? No, its not rhetorical. I'm asking to make sure we're using these terms the same way. Aka, for clarification.
Newtonian gravity is a beautiful theory and it works, but it's wrong.
Edit. Ninja'd by the laid back plum.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.