(August 17, 2019 at 6:41 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:Sure, take refuge in linguistic gymnastics all you like. But we all see it for what it is.(August 17, 2019 at 4:57 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Why should there be a gene for the english language, and is there any evidence for such a gene.
If my parents speak two languages do I get one, both, or a mix. Would a mix cause me to speak a hybrid language?
If there where no such gene, why should that be an issue for behavior? Wouldn’t it be simpler to say that language fits the extended?
It wouldn't be an issue for behavior; only for the boundaries of phenotype. English doesn't exist until someone behaves it, so we're clearly dealing with behavior exclusively and not the environment like a nest or a dam.
Classifying it as an extended phenotype is fine, but the term seems to be used more for things that are out there in the tangible environment. English doesn't seem to be that.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 5, 2024, 7:33 pm
Thread Rating:
Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)