(August 20, 2019 at 11:41 pm)mcc1789 Wrote:(August 20, 2019 at 11:15 pm)Grandizer Wrote: I skimmed through it all a short while ago. Interesting article. Since I have all the time in the world now, what with not on any project at work lately, I'm going to now read this very thoroughly and see if I have something to object to their eventual solution.
I can probably summarize it if you want.
I just got done reading up to the author's alleged dismantling of the argument for logical determinism, and I remain unconvinced that he did.
The argument does not say A is necessarily true if A is always true in the actual world. The argument is that if A is always true in the actual world, then it cannot ever be false in the actual world, not that it cannot be false in a possible world. I don't see how the argument is invalid and unsound.
Maybe I'm confused and missing something here?
I'll read the rest later as have to go now.