(December 18, 2019 at 12:43 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: A Bad definition..is still a definition. The god concept doesn't fail for a lack of defining things. That's all that god concepts do to begin with. They define the sacred, and our relationship to the sacred -even if nothing actually is "sacred" in any less-than-novel sense.
Point is, they do the defining regardless of whether there's an actual referent, and so the objection from a lack of definition is a non-starter.
I see your point but my point is that when a thing is so poorly defined, the argument about the ontology of such a thing is a non-starter, especially when the believers can't even agree among themselves.
But fnord bloongies dlorbet the flord into bringle and caused my green idea to sleep furiously. So thrumbo the gnerblet.
QED