(December 23, 2019 at 8:55 am)SUNGULA Wrote:(December 23, 2019 at 7:45 am)onlinebiker Wrote: Yeah... Zoomey Joe from the tattoo parlor would be much better..Again there's that assumption being good with money makes you a good leader .Spoilers i doesn't .
(December 23, 2019 at 8:05 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: The point being that just because you're financially well-off doesn't necessarily mean you're fit to set public policy (nor is it a disqualification to do so).Considering all the millionaires who have been ruthless monsters ..........
An outstanding example is when billionaire Wilbur Ross (Commerce Secretary) suggested that furloughed federal workers should take out loans to purchase food.
Boru
A guy who has made lots of money stands a better chance of understanding finance than one who lost a bunch of money.
It's why the laws should change and politicians should be required to fully disclose their financials...
Currently they are not compelled - but by tradition. Tradition does not equate law.
Crooks and cons would not run for office were this the case.
We wouldn't be having a Trump discussion...