You can't blame cases due to protests on the lockdown. That was a decision made by the protesters. Same with groceries. Those were irrational actions by people acting on emotion, similar to your claims here.
No, "significant" means "sufficiently great or important to be worthy of attention." Let's see these studies you mention. And yes, I did show lockdowns work. If Europeans go nuts over them and refuse to abide, again, that's not a failure of the lockdown.
There were fewer cases during summer because lockdowns in the prior months reduced spread, and people don't gather inside as much in the summer. There are other reasons also. We shouldn't try to describe a complex situation with a few simplifications, such as your vitamin D nonsense and grocery shopping.
The source I listed for mortality in 2017 and 2020 was the US Center for Disease Control. They would know. I don't know where you're trying to go with this comparison, but it does show you have inaccurate, unspecified sources.
No, "significant" means "sufficiently great or important to be worthy of attention." Let's see these studies you mention. And yes, I did show lockdowns work. If Europeans go nuts over them and refuse to abide, again, that's not a failure of the lockdown.
There were fewer cases during summer because lockdowns in the prior months reduced spread, and people don't gather inside as much in the summer. There are other reasons also. We shouldn't try to describe a complex situation with a few simplifications, such as your vitamin D nonsense and grocery shopping.
The source I listed for mortality in 2017 and 2020 was the US Center for Disease Control. They would know. I don't know where you're trying to go with this comparison, but it does show you have inaccurate, unspecified sources.
