The meaninglessness of the Christian god concept

[fr0d0]

2 things. It is a whole new experience for me that xtianity is now polytheistic, ie more than 1 Deity.

Well quite. You don't understand Christianity. See my response to toro above.

Xtianity isn't polytheistic: holds that many gods make up the Godhead. But monotheistic: has only one God in the Godhead, whilst acknowledging that other gods (which are already evidenced in the cultural context) do exist.

Using Deity as primary attribute is still invalid as previously explained the term Deity, is not positively identified.

Of course the terms 'deity' and 'God' are both fully identified and obviously seperate in definition, in exactly the same way as man and homosapien are!

You like the word failure but your rebuttals so far have brought you no joy. As this doesn't. Again a projection of your own position onto me.

Captain... you are trying to say that 'gods', because the term can be applied to all religious deity's, invalidates the word 'God' when considering ONLY the Christian God. This is a point made that you just by saying 'oh no it isn't IS NOT CHALLENGED. Sorry for the caps but I'm getting really tired of repeating myself.

You seem to have changed from a person who could make and take vlid points into someone who like Rhythm, ignores everything put to them and baselessly repeats the same old bullshit.

No homo sapien is a place holder for a species which can be described, ie there nature is describable and is a positive primary attribute. I think you are focussing too much on the terms: 'god', 'Deity, 'man', 'homo spaien' and not enough on the description I have provided with them. The failure is either mine to convey information, yours to understand or both. But the argument is sound.

I'm sorry Captain I can't see a point there.

How is God (The specific Xtian God)'s nature not described and describable?

However it is FOR YOU NOT ME to offer some poistive primary attribute of a god (or in your case the xtian god (or 3 gods or whatever)).

I see. So you are saying that God isn't defined because you don't know the definitions. An argument from ignorance? Because he is very thoroughly defined in the bible, for you to check out and know exactly that definition.

If you claim that this God has no definitions, surely the oness is upon you to find out if that claim is correct. I'm not making any claims: I'm just pointing out the flaw in yours, and showing you the evidence.

We are left with the impression that god is mysterious, unknowable, etc currently which would ultimately render the term god meaningless as per the original argument.

A gross generalisation intended to make something undefined where it clearly isn't. Only to you is God meaningless and unknowable. Internally, to you, therefore, is the only place where this supposition works. You define your own misunderstanding.