Would I be correct in concluding that an implication of Fr0d0's including 'not susceptible to empirical detection' as an essential element in the definition of the Christian God is that for any God for which there is empirical evidence, it is not evidence of the Christian God, by definition? For example, we could be assured that a miracle that withstands scientific scrutiny is not the work of the Christian God.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 6, 2024, 4:56 pm
Thread Rating:
|
The meaninglessness of the Christian god concept
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Why do you not believe in the concept of a God? | johndoe122931 | 110 | 9264 |
June 19, 2021 at 12:21 pm Last Post: Mermaid |
|
| Why do atheists claim that the concept of God is so unlikely | Yadayadayada | 66 | 9009 |
January 4, 2017 at 5:22 pm Last Post: Cyberman |
|
| "Gods", a concept too fuzzy to invest belief in .. either way. | Whateverist | 24 | 13699 |
June 26, 2012 at 11:26 am Last Post: Angrboda |
|
| God as a metaphor/concept | warrenmi | 4 | 1559 |
May 18, 2012 at 3:39 am Last Post: Angrboda |
|
| Meaningfulness v meaninglessness; theism vs atheism; | dqualk | 179 | 52654 |
March 1, 2011 at 8:50 am Last Post: KichigaiNeko |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
