(November 1, 2021 at 3:55 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(October 31, 2021 at 10:16 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: As usual you missed the point entirely.
Trying to sequester carbon in trees is just kicking the can down the road.
Every gram of carbon in a tree will eventually make it right back into the environment when the tree dies.
Even nonstop planting of trees won' t make a difference - you will just make a bigger pile of dead wood in the future.
Yes burying it is not really a viable option - but it is the only scenario that would actually make a long term difference. In order to reduce environmental carbon you need to capture it in something that won' t biodegrade.
...
Waiting for the " you hate trees" idiots to chime in.
What part of ‘cycle’ is giving you trouble? It’s perfectly ok that the carbon stored in trees will eventually be released.
Boru
What part of " futile" is giving YOU trouble?
Problem - burning of hydrocarbons had put a higher amount of carbon into the atmosphere in the form of (mainly) CO2 - thus elevating temperature.
Proposed solution - remove carbon from atmosphere and store it.
Your method - store it in a sieve.