Dinosaurs Weren't in the Bible...They Never Even Existed.

[tuxcomputers]

There is? Where? Is there a hypothesis or theory that is able to make predictions based on the data?

When I used the word “proof” why did you automatically assume we were talking about scientific inquiry? Whenever I say proof I mean deductive proof, not scientific induction.

... and the provision of that proof is where?????

Actually even if you take all the interactions between atoms in the universe over the history of time abiogenesis is still a statistical impossibility. It’s funny you have so much blind faith on certain matters but not others.

Well sort of, I have faith in the scientific process that would have ripped apart the hypothesis if it wasn't viable. It hasn't been, unless your smart enough to provide some proof that "god did it"

... and them finding a surprise proves what? That the predictive power of the theory is not perfect and discover a new dinosaur or the entire thing needs to be chucked in the bin in favour of your "just random shaped rocks hypothesis?

No you just seemed to imply it was a perfect science, so I was merely correcting you.

No, your just an arsehole.

You posted an image of some statues implying they were "proof" of giant, that was intellectually dishonest any surrounding material was structurally the same as the end product. The process of fossilisation produces 2 different types of material. That takes a long long time, millions of years, not enough time for human bones to fossilise.

You and I both know that nobody has ever even observed “the process of fossilization” to take place, so stop engaging in storytelling and stick to actual science please.

No one has observed an electron but you are perfectly happy to use a computer to show the world your a dick. Nobody has to "observe" the process, they observed different stages of the process with different fossils. They had an idea how it happened, they produced... oh wait I already told you how sciencey stuff all works... but you are numbfuck skull.

So how do the same shapes keep appearing in the same strata and not out of place in a different strata. Your hypothesis is that given enough time a fully formed a T Rex shaped rocks would appear in the completely wrong strata right?

Nope, given enough time all of those shapes could appear in similar layers of strata. It’s just a coincidence.

More numbfuckery, at what point would you stop saying "just a coincidence"? Never?... yeah thought so.

When the idea that these "rocks" were actually ancient bones of extinct animals I am sure the initial reaction from scientists was the same as yours. As more and more evidence was mounted that it was more than mere coincidence their position became less and less tenable.

I think they might have missed the bit in your scientist training that evidence can be more than just direct observation. I would suggest you write a VERY angry letter to wherever you went that they missed teaching you such a basic concept. You are piss poor example of how good their education is, please let us know where you went so that we can avoid such a pathetic institution.

How do you explain the linear time line of evolving animals? Less evolved shapes appear in older strata, more evolved animals with similar shapes appear in later strata.

Wait, are we still talking about dinosaurs here or now evolution?

Please tell me that you have enough brain power to be able to breath without mechanical assistance because you don't seem to be demonstrating enough in this thread.

You really do have your head up your arse don't you.... next post just say "lalalalalalalalalalala.... I can't hear you.... I can't hear you", it's just as intellectually honest

Do you usually try to talk trash after getting intellectually spanked or is this a new thing you are trying out?

ummm I think you have the wrong idea about the concept of spanking.... when your arse is being paddled it's not you giving the spanking.

Winning by letting arguments stand un-refuted? Maybe you shouldn’t be anyone’s coach on here.

ummmm... I don't think you know the meaning of "un-refuted"

I actually am employed as a scientist Toots.

They produce data from experiments based on that idea.

Oh snap! Where are the experiments proving that fossilization occurs naturally over millions of years like you assert it does!? We didn’t even make it past your second step. I told you that you were telling stories and not engaging in real science.

ummmm... if you are for real and you are employed as a scientist you better hope they never find out about you being on here making such stupid comments.

If there was a scientist that was able to prove that fossils are just rocks that looked like bones they would be so fucking famous that 16yo virgin school girls would line up around the block to suck his 75 year old cock.

Burden of proof fallacy, it is up to you to prove they are the remnants of animals that died millions of years ago. Since you don’t have any empirical data proving fossilization even occurs you have a bit of an uphill road my friend.

No, you have your proof they are, your just ignoring it and doing the equivalent of "lalalalalalala".