Mass shooting in the middle school Vladislav Ribnikar in Belgrade

[Irreligious Atheist]

You think that because you’re under the mistaken impression that they give a shit about rights.  They do not.  They’re not shooting themselves in the foot, they’re shooting exactly what they mean to.

But thanks, anyway, on telling us all the value of learning to sympathize with terrorists.

Jane Fonda is not actually a terrorist, but I do sympathize with her being deeply disturbed with AFABs losing rights, as did a massive amount of people, as she was mostly given a pass for her comments by non-conservatives. You think your proxy army across the world should all die to secure your geo-political aims and you proudly call yourself a neo-con, so clearly you get Jane Fonda too and you go way beyond where I do. Of course a lot of terrorists care about certain rights but not about others, just as you do. You're conservative, but I don't know exactly what you want to conserve. Not gun rights. You'll get uppity if I speak out against police abolition or prison abolition or court system abolition. You're fine with universities banning the word "field". You don't want to conserve language or much else, so I don't quite see the conservatism, other than the neo-conservatism where you want to occupy other countries and kill brown people for eternity, and then assume someone like me who doesn't want hunting rifles banned is going to end up being the terrorist who goes out and does violence with nothing to back up your paranoia.

You're making a mirror argument that dumbfuck conservatives made in the years following 9/11. "Look at these rare, few Muslim terrorist events, therefore you should fear the Muslims." Now it's turned into "Look at these extremely rare, few White terrorist events, therefore you should fear the whites." What are the actual chances, I, Irreligious Atheist, end up being a violent terrorist (murder)? One in millions is your answer. But you act like it's greater than 50 % or some shit. And I'm the conspiracy theorist?