(May 19, 2023 at 4:24 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(May 19, 2023 at 8:36 am)FlatAssembler Wrote: You can argue that leads to a 30% overestimate, but you can not claim that leads to a 90% overestimate (which would be necessary for guns to kill more people than they save).
THERE IS NO 'ESTIMATE'!! The whole thing is a farce, as I've explained to you before.
Boru
Well, like I've explained multiple times, I am having a hard time explaining why the Gary Kleck's study would be pseudoscience without implying that not only my latest paper is pseudoscience, but that my entire field is pseudoscience.