(May 30, 2023 at 1:26 pm)arewethereyet Wrote:(May 30, 2023 at 1:17 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote: The conclusions and premises of my paper have nothing to do with the topic, but the methodology of my paper is an example of good social science methodology. And the fact that you have never published a paper in social sciences and will readily claim entire fields (not papers, fields) of social sciences are pseudoscience tells us more about you than about Gary Kleck's study.
I would strongly suggest you take the advice of staff.
Very strongly.
He's currently writing an advice-taking program. This time it'll work.
"For the only way to eternal glory is a life lived in service of our Lord, FSM; Verily it is FSM who is the perfect being the name higher than all names, king of all kings and will bestow upon us all, one day, The great reclaiming" -The Prophet Boiardi-
![[Image: s-l640.jpg]](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/DjAAAOSwpIhe1HCM/s-l640.jpg)
Conservative trigger warning.
