(May 30, 2023 at 1:38 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(May 30, 2023 at 1:17 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote: The conclusions and premises of my paper have nothing to do with the topic, but the methodology of my paper is an example of good social science methodology. And the fact that you have never published a paper in social sciences and will readily claim entire fields (not papers, fields) of social sciences are pseudoscience tells us more about you than about Gary Kleck's study.
As Nudger said, I never claimed that the social sciences are pseudoscience. I’m simply criticizing Kleck’s paper as poorly done social science.
As awty said, take a hint.
Boru
You are criticizing the Kleck's paper... with arguments that can be used to reject the entire fields of social sciences.