RE: Islam true religion?
January 30, 2012 at 2:59 pm
(This post was last modified: January 30, 2012 at 3:10 pm by reverendjeremiah.)
(January 30, 2012 at 2:56 pm)Zakir_250 Wrote:(January 30, 2012 at 2:54 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote:Um Gandhi spoke good things about Muhammad (Peace be upon him). Also he (peace be upon him) was named number one most influential in history.(January 30, 2012 at 2:37 pm)Minimalist Wrote: And superman could leap tall buildings with a single bound.....and he's about as real as fucking mohammed.
He's more moral and much more entertaining than mohammad.
The difference is, we can PROVE that Ghandi existed. You cant prove your warlord pedophile existed.
P.S. - if you are talking to the world, it tends to make more sense to kiss religious peoples asses to help sway them to your point of view.
Just imagine Ghandi saying "Mohammad was a pedophile...now join me in my quest for peace!"
Yeah...you got dupped...lol. Ghandi WANTED religion to spread, which is a big thing I disagree with on him.
HADITH
wikipedia Wrote:In addition, the hadith collections are accounts of the verbal and physical traditions of Muhammad that date from several generations after his death.[34] Hadith compilations are records of the traditions or sayings of Muhammad. They might be defined as the biography of Muhammad perpetuated by the long memory of his community for their exemplification and obedience.[35]
Several generations AFTER his death? Hadith is actually WORSE to use as proof of Muhammad actually existing than the gospels are for Jesus. At least the for gospels were written a fe DECADES after the death of Jesus (which still doesnt look good.) These books (the hadith) are clearly nothing to do with Muhammad and everything to do with later warlords using the name just to manipulate
They rely HEAVILY on oral traditions..slippery slope...now all of the oral traditions of the FSM are just as "historical" as the hadith