(March 19, 2012 at 5:06 pm)StatCrux Wrote: EXACTLY the problem is the term marriage, the proposals are to allow civil "marriages" for same sex couples, not civil "partnerships" how many times do I have to state this? If the proposals were to allow civil partnerships to be performed by religious institutions, fine. Its the use of the term marriage that is the problem
Nobody is forcing your church, or any church to perform such ceremonies. Only those churches who wish to perform them.
Where the FUCK do you get off trying to dictate to the rest of the religious (and non-religious) what the meaning of marriage is?