Okay. The river tracks...
The marks are tridactyl prints. Here is the actual evidence.
First we have a link from THE INSTITUTE FOR CREATION RESEARCH:
http://www.icr.org/article/paluxy-river-mystery/
They almost sound like scientists! Amazing!
They referenced this paper by Kuban, as well as many other sources:
http://paleo.cc/paluxy/elong.htm
The marks are tridactyl prints. Here is the actual evidence.
First we have a link from THE INSTITUTE FOR CREATION RESEARCH:
http://www.icr.org/article/paluxy-river-mystery/
Quote:Even though it would now be improper for creationists to continue to use the Paluxy data as evidence against evolution, in the light of these questions, there is still much that is not known about the tracks and continued research is in order. We stand committed to truth, and will gladly modify or abandon our previous interpretation of the Paluxy data as the facts dictate.
They almost sound like scientists! Amazing!
They referenced this paper by Kuban, as well as many other sources:
http://paleo.cc/paluxy/elong.htm
42
