A good case against God

[CliveStaples]

That is not my assertion. I have pointed out that you assholes have not provided any evidence to support your assertion of a god-figure.

Again, cite where I said "impossible.". Put up or shut up.

Looking back, I see where I was correcting your misrepresentation of "proof" to "EVIDENCE", but missed your misrepresentation "you cannot provide" -- which is not what I said, either -- when I copy-pasted it. that was an oversight on my part, and here you are for a couple of fucking pages hacking away at your own straw man.

Shove the straw man up your ass.

lol already showed where you made the impossibility claim

Spoken like a True Christian™ LULZ

Nice talk, Christian. Well done. You set a fine example.

Looks like you need some more tampons.

The special pleading that dodges the question of where your Gawd-thang came from and what created it. You didn't know? What a fucking retard.

I'm familiar with that particular attack on the KCA. I didn't want to assume that it was what you were referring to; there might have been a new line of attack that I hadn't seen before.

Still whining like a bitch, even when you swear. You are a piece of fucking work.

My sister recommends Kotex super absorbent.

Then you have no fucking argument, asshole. That is the entirety of my claim, fucking moron.


That is not my claim. Shove the wicker man up your ass.

lol already showed where you made the impossibility claim

Oh, the goodie two shoes prissy puss is mad now. So much for your precious christardianity.

Maybe two packs, family size.

You already admitted my claim. All you are doing now is playing a shell game with a straw man and making a public ass of yourself.


Again -- straw man. You assholes make the positive claim of the existence of your sky fairy. And you asshole xtards have not provided a shred of evidence to support that claim. And you fucking idiot asshole have been waving a straw man at me for a couple of hours. Fucking idiot.

I made no positive claims.

You misrepresented my rebuttal and I missed that part of your misrepresentation when I copied it to correct it. Go fuck yourself in the ass;. With a cactus. Wrapped in barbed wire.

lol I already showed where you made the impossibility claim.


...aaaaaaaaaaaand you still haven't supported your impossibility claim.

Or would you care to argue that "you can produce absolutely no evidence at all to prove that it is not" should not be interpreted to mean "you can't produce any evidence at all to prove that it is not"?

---

But you aren't positing the existence of ancient men for which we have plenty of evidence.

You posit the exitence of a god that plays an active role in the universe. A creator god, the big cheese, the head honcho but what do we find nada, zip, zero, nothing the god who wasnt there.

But that makes the evidence claim even less plausible; since there isn't always evidence of the effect that humans, which we know exist, have had on the world, how can you claim that there must certainly be gatherable evidence of God's effect on the world, when His effect could be even more subtle than any particular human's?