You know very well that the proof I talk about in relation to JP's & A's arguments are, as they say, 'assuming God'. You're being very petty trying to make a point out of that like I'm saying something contradictory when I'm plainly not.
I have told you until I am blue in the face that my belief is entirely rational, and given every reason why that is so.
Without you actually believing this yourself you are saying you won't accept it.. which is saying that without holding the belief you will not accept it - which is totally acceptable to me, and there's nothing more to be said on that.
To conclude: Yes you won't get it because if you did you would adopt my conclusion.
I have told you until I am blue in the face that my belief is entirely rational, and given every reason why that is so.
Without you actually believing this yourself you are saying you won't accept it.. which is saying that without holding the belief you will not accept it - which is totally acceptable to me, and there's nothing more to be said on that.
To conclude: Yes you won't get it because if you did you would adopt my conclusion.
