(July 27, 2012 at 6:05 am)Selliedjoup Wrote: You state that you claim to understand reality and don't need to know all of it to dismiss that its size or the question how big is reality to be nonsensical. How much of reality do you claim to know as a percentage, to know you know enough to dismiss size as a nonsensical question?
You do understand that by talking about reality in percentages, you already are implying that it can be measured - the very thing that is nonsensical. Answer me this - what percentage of numbers do you know and if you don't know that, how do you claim to know the number system?
(July 27, 2012 at 6:05 am)Selliedjoup Wrote: Your football comparison was dire and desperate, where did I mention a "game" of football? I mentioned known physical things. Why don't you include the religion beliefs of the players to prove that the size of reality is futile?
Here - "For example, I understand football and the dimensions of the field, ball etc.".
By referring to the field and ball separately, the only thing the original football could be referring to is the game of football. And I don't need to bring up the player's religious affiliations since the examples I gave are sufficient.