RE: '...And I'm an Atheist'
August 9, 2012 at 9:02 pm
(This post was last modified: August 9, 2012 at 9:03 pm by CliveStaples.)
(August 9, 2012 at 8:38 pm)jonb Wrote: So the mad ramble was to explain the standard formula for basic logic without reference to atheism at all, and you took how long to say that? Sorry I did not recognise you were talking at such a basic level.
So has your definition for your version of what atheism is any validity to any body other than you?
Uh, I'm not sure what you're asking. Does anyone else think my definition is valid? It hasn't been popular here, but that's only the opinion of like 5 people who have talked about it.
I proved here that my definition is equivalent to "X is an atheist if and only if X doesn't believe 'At least one god exists.'"
(August 9, 2012 at 9:01 pm)jonb Wrote:(August 9, 2012 at 8:53 pm)CliveStaples Wrote: You're right. It doesn't require intelligence.
BOOM!
Remind me who said-
Quote: Which is why it irritates me that your ideological compatriot assumed I was being high-and-mighty.
I wasn't being high-and-mighty. I was being funny. =P
“The truth of our faith becomes a matter of ridicule among the infidels if any Catholic, not gifted with the necessary scientific learning, presents as dogma what scientific scrutiny shows to be false.”
