(October 8, 2012 at 11:29 am)Akincana Krishna dasa Wrote: Science can't talk about God.
Why?
Channelling AronRa again: "Anytime a supernatural entity reaches into the prime material plane, it should pull its arm out dripping with physics. It should leave evidence. But it doesn't."
In other words, an entity which can interact with our Universe in any tangible way whatsoever, however small, must be detectable and thus falls squarely into the remit of science - whether or not our level of science is high enough right now to make such detections is irrelevant, and is in fact relabelling the entity from "supernatural" to "natural that we haven't found yet". I contend that such an entity is beyond all knowledge, yours included, thus you can make no honest truth claims for it.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'