RE: Ask, Seek, Knock
October 23, 2012 at 2:34 pm
(This post was last modified: October 23, 2012 at 3:06 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(October 23, 2012 at 2:06 pm)MysticKnight Wrote:(October 23, 2012 at 1:51 pm)Chuck Wrote: It may be false, but it is true, huh? You got any better ones?
Well I gave the example of the problem of evil. The problem of evil basically is assuming "there is no possible explanation" of (a) "benevolent" purpose(s) behind suffering/evil in the world.
What is evil but a name you give to a collection of things which your lack the capacity to understand and appreciate, in lieu of the honest diligence required to actually build up your capacity for understanding and appreciation to encompass those things?
Does this simple intellectual laziness justify overarching revision of cosmology?