(October 27, 2012 at 10:33 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: So women should be able to walk naked in the street, simply all in the name of freedom.
Yes.
(October 27, 2012 at 10:33 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Does this apply to work and school? Should school allow teachers to come in naked to class, all in the name of freedom?
No. That would depend on the terms and conditions applicable to the workplace. For example, I'm not allowed to wear a casual attire to my work. The same principle would apply.
(October 27, 2012 at 10:33 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Wow, yes your moral principles are obviously clear to everyone.
So, there wouldn't be need for any more clarification?
(October 27, 2012 at 10:33 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: So it's corruption that the streets are not allowed to be filled with naked women and man.
"Not allowed to be filled"? You assume that if it was allowed then they would be filled with naked people.
To be clear, I consider going out in the public naked to be both immoral and indecent. But for it to be a question of morality, it should be a question of that person's choice. By disallowing it, it is no longer within the purview of morality and therefore the basis is corrupted.
(October 27, 2012 at 10:33 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Should people be allowed to have sex in public as well?
Who cares if the kids see it or not? Since we don't want to be impinging on their freedom, right....
Not sure on that one - since I don't know what psychological harm it may or may not cause.
(October 27, 2012 at 10:33 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: They have their explanations. It's to restrict lust in society and force women to protect their dignity.
Except, that dignity would mean nothing if it has to be protected forcefully.
(October 27, 2012 at 10:33 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: They value dignity and honor of their daughters, more then, freedom for them to chose what they wear.
Except, the value those daughters attach to their own dignity and honor should take precedence over how much their fathers value it.
Further, the very idea that a woman's dignity or honor depends upon what she wears rather than who she is reeks of male chauvinism.
(October 27, 2012 at 10:33 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Why are they wrong? Freedom triumphs over all principles right? Prove it.
I already have. In a lengthy discourse in "Legalization if Polygamy thread". Read it.