(November 21, 2012 at 12:23 pm)Drich Wrote: [quote='Darkstar' pid='364949' dateline='1353469759']
Quote:Sometimes I have heard theists (mainly Drich) say he is 'righteous'. From how the word has been used, one can only draw the conclusion that 'righteous' = objectively moral.Righteousness is an unchanging absolute standard.
Oops, I keep forgetting that one. You are right, there is a fourth argument.
There is just one [major] problem: Righteousness being objective does not make it objectively good.
Scratch that, there are two problems. The one where Jesus contradicts one of Yahweh's laws. (as in my previous post) If the law was objectively good, then why would Jesus prevent it from being carried out? (Note: I'm going to be gone for a few days, so I'll get back to this later).