Must all be proven?

[leo-rcc]

Atheism is based on science lack of believe in relgion and evoluten.

Atheism has nothing to do with science, or "lack of believe in religion", or evolution.

Do we need evidence to believe in something.

No, but it is the most reliable method of finding out that whatever one believes is true or not.

For proving the super natural no longer makes it super natural.

And what is wrong with that?

Have any of you walked on the moon? No? Then how do you know you can do that.

You dont. Either you go there and find out or you take someones word for it. The thing is though, if you are determined enough, you can find out for sure whether you can walk on the moon or not. I have yet to see some testing method for your supernatural deity. Even more so, it is the one thing you count on to keep your mythology going.

And my question for evolution is...

If evolution is the foundation for lifes existance

It isn't.

can anyone give me an example or show me how any species has naturally developed new information on its DNA.

What do you mean with "new information"?

If evolution is true why is there no ape/man in existance today.

There are, they are called humans and other apes.

We see neat patterns and believe thats what happened but does it always work like that?

evolution holds no great proof. Its still a theory as religion is.

Look up the definition of scientific theory before you write such nonsense.

If evolution was proven there would no longer be religion

Evolution is not a religion, it contains no dogma. If evolution is proved wrong tomorrow no scientist will hold on to it. But until now all the evidence mounts up in favour of evolution. If you can provide some evidence of an alternative hypothesis please let me know, I am all ears.