(October 7, 2009 at 9:14 am)fr0d0 Wrote: You say that this is 'special evidence' as if it is scientific but not as we know it.
No, I mean special in than the scientific method doesn't apply at all. Not that it could apply if the right method were found. But I don't think that something that doesn't stand up to testing by scientific methods counts as evidence.
That is, I would say that non-scientific evidence is simply non-evidence.
(October 7, 2009 at 9:14 am)fr0d0 Wrote: That God is somehow defined temporally when he clearly isn't.
How do you know that something can exist non-temporally? You assert that your god exists "outside of time" without knowing if this even has any meaning.
Galileo was a man of science oppressed by the irrational and superstitious. Today, he is used by the irrational and superstitious who claim they are being oppressed by science - Mark Crislip
