Muhammad the Greatest: A Comparative Study

[Darkstar]

You JUST said that eye-witness accounts are useless!
You discount both eyewitnesses and historians in one swoop here! I guess Christians don't have a monopoly on hypocrisy...

Response: The words "eyewitness accounts are useless" are mentioned no where. Anothe failed attempt.

Oh, but you certainly implied it, especially when pressed on it.
So, either accept eyewitness accounts for Hitler's rise to power, or throw out your own. Not to mention that thousand+ year old "eyewitness accounts" are not particularily reliable. Seventy year old ones, on the other hand, are much more apt to be trustworthy.

Yet if asked how you know that these historians were eyewitnesses, your answer is "because they said so", thus you debunked yourself again. For it still relies on hearsay that the eyewitness were actually eyewitness.