Burden of Proof

[Darkstar]

---

No one has proved that the burden of proof is with the claiment all they have done is make claims it should be based on custom and practice, or on fanciful ideas on how the universe of logical discussion would break down without proving or testing these ideas. You claim the burden of proof belongs to the person making the claim so now follow your own maxim the one you love so much and PROVE YOUR CLAIM. let me see proof and not conjecture, assumptions and bias.

No one has proved that the burden of proof is with the claiment all they have done is make claims it should be based on custom and practice, or on fanciful ideas on how the universe of logical discussion would break down without proving or testing these ideas. You claim the burden of proof belongs to the person making the claim so now follow your own maxim the one you love so much and PROVE YOUR CLAIM. let me see proof and not conjecture, assumptions and bias.

DO NOT continue copying and pasting the same post for multiple replies. This is considered SPAMMING and you can be BANNED forthright for this action. You may feel free to contradict any and all members you wish, but you will abide by the rules.

Let this be your unofficial warning and move on.

---

No one has proved that the burden of proof is with the claimant all they have done is make claims it should be based on custom and practice, or on fanciful ideas on how the universe of logical discussion would break down without proving or testing these ideas. You claim the burden of proof belongs to the person making the claim so now follow your own maxim the one you love so much and PROVE YOUR CLAIM. let me see proof and not conjecture, assumptions and bias.

...well I'm not actually laughing, more of a chuckle.

Moving on!

I accept you ask valid questions but its not an obvious answer and I have already shown that the french civil legal system operates on the opposite maxim so the answer its obvious doesn't qualify as a proof.

I just got back from a three week haitus, so I didn't read your comments about the French legal system. Regardless, if we assumed every claim to be true without evidence then you must also accept the existence of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, because you cannot prove it doesn't exist.