RE: Burden of Proof
January 8, 2013 at 6:13 pm
(This post was last modified: January 8, 2013 at 6:13 pm by Cyberman.)
Reading through the last page of posts, a thought occurs. Why is it, I wonder, that Kurt Gödel is held in such high regard amongst apologists for speaking about "God" outside of his field of mathematics; yet when Richard Dawkins speaks on the same subject outside his specialist field of evolutionary biology, those same apologists generate no end of hate mail and public castigation?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
