RE: Irreducible Complexity.
November 17, 2008 at 4:31 am
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2008 at 7:12 am by leo-rcc.)
Jason,
In that case my revision:
1) God did not know how to design the eye better and therefore she isn't omnipotent
2) God did know how to make the eye better but she was lazy which is not a particularly godlike trait in my book either.
3) There is no design at all.
If a god exists and humans where her special pet project as religion says us humans are, then argument 2 holds no water. I know that when I design my robots and there is one I want to succeed more than any other I will go the extra mile in designing and building it to the highest degree of my ability, no matter how much extra time and effort it takes. I am sure a god would do the same.
In that case my revision:
1) God did not know how to design the eye better and therefore she isn't omnipotent
2) God did know how to make the eye better but she was lazy which is not a particularly godlike trait in my book either.
3) There is no design at all.
If a god exists and humans where her special pet project as religion says us humans are, then argument 2 holds no water. I know that when I design my robots and there is one I want to succeed more than any other I will go the extra mile in designing and building it to the highest degree of my ability, no matter how much extra time and effort it takes. I am sure a god would do the same.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
