Hi Catherine,
This basically puts you back to your "The lord works in mysterious ways" argument. I don't know why it did it like that, but I trust it had a good reason for it.
How is that an answer?
Do we really? The way I see it (no pun intended) is that its remarkable that we have as good eyesight as we do, not thanks to the designer but inspite of the designer, should one really have existed. Just because it works, doesn't make the reason for doing it this way a good one, in fact its a very silly one.
And then there is your site that pulls this one out of its hat*:
This I want to see hard evidence of.
*euphemism
CoxRox Wrote:If a God is responsible for the laws of physics, mathematics, life, a human eye, all things which I believe infer a designer, then I trust this designer knew what He/She was doing.
This basically puts you back to your "The lord works in mysterious ways" argument. I don't know why it did it like that, but I trust it had a good reason for it.
How is that an answer?
CoxRox Wrote:Many of the objections to the structure of the eye have been explained and we can see that there are good reasons for the wiring etc being the way it is.
Do we really? The way I see it (no pun intended) is that its remarkable that we have as good eyesight as we do, not thanks to the designer but inspite of the designer, should one really have existed. Just because it works, doesn't make the reason for doing it this way a good one, in fact its a very silly one.
And then there is your site that pulls this one out of its hat*:
Quote:How can one place any significant probability on the origin of life apart from intelligent design, when up to ninety percent of present U. S. scientists seem to be shifting toward some variation of intelligent design ?
This I want to see hard evidence of.
*euphemism
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
