Ryantology Wrote:You made posts to which I responded. Would you like a gold star for that? You have not yet proved anything. Show me the organ. Show me proof that one must have that organ in order to understand numbers. Don't waste my time with your assumption-laced logic arguments. Don't waste my time with whining. And don't tell me what to do. You're not my real dad.
You switch the argument AGAIN! Now I have to SHOW the organ to you! Pick a claim!
First and foremost, I've been claiming that this is a non-physical organ is non-physical since the first post. It will not appear like a liver in front of your eyeballs. I cannot point. It does not have spacial dimensions. You can't demand that. I don't yell, "I must see evolution! I don't believe it unless I can watch it! Plus, all my dogs were born with 2 eyes!" because it sounds ridiculous. You are crying for what is literally impossible (evolution takes more time than we have, else it would be possible).
As for the proof, that's already been done. I even cited it! First you said quantity was material. Then you said it wasn't material, but only a concept. Now you have made 2 demands for proof, one I completed before you asked and the other impossible. Also, you continue the accusations of assumption, but never say where. If I have assumed something, I could probably go back and prove it.
Ryantology Wrote:What is a coherent metaphysics?
Aquinas has one. Some of his science is wrong. The small parts that deal with that have been corrected. If his premises were true, he would have been right.
The Lord bless you and keep you; the Lord make his face to shine upon you and be gracious to you; the Lord lift up his countenance upon you and give you peace.
