RE: creationist tried to tell me embrology doesn't support evolution.
April 16, 2013 at 5:17 pm
(This post was last modified: April 16, 2013 at 5:25 pm by Statler Waldorf.)
(April 16, 2013 at 4:41 pm)Chuck Wrote: So it is the infallibility of such a unusually fallible creature as yourself that you rely on, then
No, it’s the infallibility of God’s revealed word. Did you look up the appeal to ridicule?
(April 16, 2013 at 4:49 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: We do?
Yup.
Quote: Please, enlighten us. How do "we" know such a thing?
I’d be more than happy to. Anti-Biblical conceptual schemes and views of reality can always be reduced to absurdity; only the Biblical conceptual scheme and view of reality is logically cogent and consistent. That alone would prove that scripture is infallible. That’s not the only proof though; since the Biblical view of reality has elements in it that even atheists agree are true, we can therefore know that the entire conceptual scheme must also be true since it is logically consistent. Therefore, we know again that scripture has to be the infallible word of God and we are justified in using it to test the merit of all other truth claims.
