Am I wrong in thinking that assuming there is such a thing as "physical evidence for God", and that the theist needs to provide it, is downright wrong? Conversely, am I wrong in thinking that the natural world could ever disprove the concept?
What would evidence for the supernatural look like? Well, it would undeniably be made up of *natural* evidence, as that's all we have around us. But, when/how does "natural evidence" stop being "natural evidence" and start being "supernatural evidence"? It sounds like an impossible task.
What would evidence for the supernatural look like? Well, it would undeniably be made up of *natural* evidence, as that's all we have around us. But, when/how does "natural evidence" stop being "natural evidence" and start being "supernatural evidence"? It sounds like an impossible task.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle