(May 15, 2013 at 2:53 pm)Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote:I find your lack of understanding of mathematical set theory disturbing.(May 13, 2013 at 8:30 pm)Sal Wrote: A confusion between term and semantics if I ever saw one.
Designating a zero amount isn't quite the same as the empty set Ø.
Zero amount... isn't the same... as an empty set zero...?
Where did you come up with that one? XD That's great, man.
... Wait... you're not actually serious, are you? 0.o
j/k.
But really. In set theory, Ø, is quite literally lack of a number, and it is defined as {} by designation.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself — and you are the easiest person to fool." - Richard P. Feynman
