Refuting Evolution

[Esquilax]

Take for example symmetry in most humans and animals
While the human body is not symmetrical from inside, it is very symmetrical from outside
It is more of beauty than function

You don't think a symmetrical body is the most functional, especially in a setting where survival isn't automatically assured? What benefit is conferred by asymmetry? Further, can you imagine the negative aspects of this, especially in terms of limbs? Say, if one were trying to escape from predators?

If evolution is not intelligent asymmetrical shapes will be much more than symmetrical ones

That's not self evident. You need to get into the habit of actually backing up your bald assertions with evidence; I'm certainly not going to take a single word a proven liar like you says at face value, least of all when it runs against conventional logic (see above.)

and if it is a cause of some genetic function then bodies will be symmetrical from inside as well.

The interior of the body is just storage space, "Scholar." Physical symmetry is advantageous because it at the very least saves on computational effort with regards to physical control, but there's nothing inherently worthy about symmetry that would cause it to exist in places where it's not maximally efficient, if a different configuration can be made.

In short: exterior symmetry is good because it's hard to run on legs that are different lengths or shapes, but interior symmetry... who cares?