Refuting Evolution

[Esquilax]

Do you mean that the grooves inside your ears or your fingerprints patterns will make a difference in your survival if it was asymmetric

Okay, look: you said that the human body was symmetrical as an act of beautification, despite the fact that you also knew the human body is asymmetrical. That's dishonesty.

Yes it is beautiful from outside, but who cares from inside?

Make up your mind; is it symmetry that's beautiful, or asymmetry? Because you've now claimed both.

The example conforms my theory not refutes it
The existence of symmetrical species proves that it is a matter of beauty
Because God selected those species to be like that
while asymmetrical shape is not an obstacle against survival.

So, basically, symmetrical species prove your point, and you're just going to ignore the asymmetrical ones, because... well, just because! You're such a fucking liar, "Scholar."

Wait............... I may be wrong
If you have an asymmetrical shape you will be considered ugly from female point of view and would not get many chances of sex, then your offspring will distinct quickly

It's not just that, as I explained to you a page ago...

I mean total nonsense, for example fish with a third leg on their back, you claim that fins started to grow into legs, why only the two bottom ones?

Because dorsal fins are generally used for stability and not propulsion, as the lower fins are. There are exceptions like the Sunfish, but in most species of fish the dorsal fin isn't a limb.

For many generations they will have no advantages till they are really functional, natural selection doesn't predict the future, so we should find fish with a third leg on their backs, or incomplete third eye that never developed into real eyes, etc.

Why? You still haven't evidenced your assertion; where is the mainstream scientific evidence for this assertion? Why haven't you published? Why haven't you even gone so far as to address the examples of nonsense mutations I have given you?

You're looking for redundant limbs, which would, in fact, be disadvantageous in most cases just by dint of being additional matter that does nothing; it's a slight downward pressure, but having an additional leg in a place where it can't assist in locomotion means you're dragging around an essentially useless piece of flesh that weighs you down, catches on things etc etc.

They should exist in all forms and almost in all fossil record that we find, actually non-existence of many mutations in most of the species is a proof of intelligence by itself another proof is that most mutations doesn't go to offspring.

Evidence, "Scholar." You have none. And your petty assertions mean nothing to anyone. If you're so smart, write a paper and get it peer reviewed; we'll see how far you get.

Go on, super genius. Show us how scientific your thinking really is.