Refuting Evolution

[Mister Agenda]

I looked through that proof, it had a bunch of premises tailored to support the conclusion he wanted

Of course I should select relevant premises

1- If time is infinite, there must be a time in the past where infinite numbers of seconds passed which is not, so time & universe had a start.

Ignores the finite past/infinite future scenario, but this one is basically okay.

2- As the universe was nothing or something static, something (else) must have started it to be time sensitive, we will call it G.

Physics indicates the universe was never absolutely nothing or something static. The most likely natural causes for the universe are that the Big Bang inflated from a previous hot dense state that went back who knows how long; or that it expanded from a fluctuation in the quantum foam. An interesting thing about quantum foam is how closely it resembles certain descriptions of what a creator god would have to be, such as existing necessarily. It looks like quantum foam can't not exist.

3- G must have some attributes, those attributes are not by choice but by logic, so they define G.

The main problem with your conclusions is that natural explanations can fit them as well as supernatural ones. So far, quantum foam fits the bill for G, and has the advantage that it's existence can potentially be tested.

Brane theory might qualify as well, but I'm not as up on it as I am on QF.