Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 16, 2024, 9:32 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Isn't the fine tuning argument ad hoc?
#46
RE: Isn't the fine tuning argument ad hoc?
(August 4, 2013 at 2:04 pm)little_monkey Wrote: I don't think we can prove anyone wrong as the fine-tuning is just a hypothesis. From a scientific POV, the question is, does it predict anything that can be used as evidence for its validity? So far, nothing. So it remains in the realm of all possibilities.

On the contrary, I think that if not for the constant theistic goal-shifting, the fine-tuning argument could easily become a valid scientific hypothesis and then be relegated to the junk-pile pretty easily.

The idea behind the fine-tuning argument is very old and very primitive - "this creation has been created for us". And since such a statement wouldn't fly within the scientific methodology, the idea had to be reshaped into the hypothesis - "Different aspects of the universe have been tuned to their current values specifically to support the existence of life". Disregarding any theistic goal-shifting, we can easily consider this idea on its own merits. The line of evidence supporting this hypothesis would be:
a) Most of the universe actually being capable of supporting life.
b) Even the parts not capable of supporting life being required for the existence of parts that do.
c) Establishing that parameters outside that range are possible - though very rare and regarded as anomalies.

If this line of evidence turned out to be false, then the fine-tuning hypothesis would stand falsified.

Suppose we were living in the biblical universe - the one where we have lands and seas spanning the whole universe and the sky as the inverted glass-bowl. Basically, a universe equivalent to our current biosphere. The evidence for fine-tuning would be strong over there. Life is possible in almost the entire "universe", the parts where it is not (deep seas) are required to support the rest and things could've been different (everything covered with volcanoes and stormy seas). So, the fine-tuning argument would've been a decent scientific theory there. Here, however, it has been falsified on almost every account. Which is why in the real world, it belongs in a trashcan.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Isn't the fine tuning argument ad hoc? - by genkaus - July 26, 2013 at 9:21 am
RE: Isn't the fine tuning argument ad hoc? - by genkaus - July 26, 2013 at 11:45 am
RE: Isn't the fine tuning argument ad hoc? - by genkaus - July 31, 2013 at 1:50 am
RE: Isn't the fine tuning argument ad hoc? - by Chas - July 26, 2013 at 10:04 am
RE: Isn't the fine tuning argument ad hoc? - by Chas - July 26, 2013 at 6:12 pm
RE: Isn't the fine tuning argument ad hoc? - by genkaus - August 4, 2013 at 6:12 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Isn’t pantheism the same thing as atheism? Ferrocyanide 177 11793 January 1, 2022 at 2:36 am
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Being Catholic isn't an ethnic thing. Joods 0 818 March 12, 2018 at 8:36 am
Last Post: Joods
  Isn't it funny... pabsta 189 57222 August 21, 2017 at 12:11 am
Last Post: Astonished
Question Even an atheist can say "the laws came from above", isn't it? theBorg 52 9301 October 3, 2016 at 9:02 am
Last Post: I_am_not_mafia
  Hypothetically, science proves free will isn't real henryp 95 14069 July 12, 2016 at 7:00 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Why Isn't Human Society A Paradise? BrianSoddingBoru4 23 7339 February 6, 2016 at 3:42 pm
Last Post: scoobysnack
  Theists, What If Your "Soul" Isn't Really Immortal? God of Mr. Hanky 22 5599 February 3, 2016 at 6:22 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Why the fine tuning argument is a pile of shit Longhorn 61 12007 August 11, 2015 at 5:42 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  Isn't it at least possible that God isn't a prude? Whateverist 14 3612 July 11, 2015 at 11:28 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  Unaffiliated/irreligious people isn't evidence of anything good TheMessiah 13 3880 June 14, 2015 at 10:25 am
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)