RE: To what extent is a rape victim responsible for the crime?
September 27, 2013 at 8:58 pm
(This post was last modified: September 27, 2013 at 9:03 pm by pineapplebunnybounce.)
(September 27, 2013 at 8:54 pm)Gilgamesh Wrote:(September 27, 2013 at 8:47 pm)pineapplebunnybounce Wrote: Why not? We're basically warned about plagiarism systematically in every single course that involves writing, and cheating in every single course that involves exams. Multiple times. If it's worth it to do it for these academic offences, why not for offences that people do commit in moments of rage/impulse?Not being sarcastic. But what if instead of everyone, we sit down just the women in society and tell them not to commit a certain crime? It'd be almost like we're saying no woman is any better than to commit whatever such crime we decide to tell them not to commit.
If you're not being sarcastic then nvm.
I hope that answers your question as to why we don't tell all men not to rape outright.
Is there a crime that is hurtful to people at the level of rape/assault/battery/murder/theft that is committed by mostly women?